Pricing
Interviewers $19. Recruiters $39. Readers free.
The hiring manager who wants a transcript never needs a seat: everyone who only reads is free. A five-hundred-person engineering org has perhaps thirty who run interviews and three who run the pipeline, and those are the seats you pay for.
macOS app, Windows next · free for ten interviews a month, no card
Free
$0ten interviews a month
Every seat free
- Every interview feature, on your own repositories
- One team
- 100 agent minutes a month
Team
$19per interviewer, per month
Recruiters $39 · collaborators $5 · viewers free
- Unlimited interviews
- One team
- 300 agent minutes per paid seat
Business
$29per interviewer, per month
Recruiters $59 · collaborators $8 · viewers free
- As many hiring teams as you need, each with their own roles, panel and pipeline
- Import roles and candidates from your ATS
- 900 agent minutes per paid seat
Agent minutes are the time our own model spends working for you as the assistant in the app, when you use ours rather than an agent already on the machine. In the room, the interviewer’s agent and the candidate’s are their own and cost nothing here. Another hundred minutes is $8 on Team and $6 on Business.
Four kinds of seat
Priced by what the seat does, because that is the only version where nobody has a reason to share a login.
| Seat | Team | Business | What it does |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interviewer | $19 | $29 | Runs interviews. Opens the room, writes the scorecard. |
| Recruiter | $39 | $59 | Runs the loop. Roles, scheduling, decisions, the day view. |
| Collaborator | $5 | $8 | Weighs in on a candidate without running interviews. |
| Viewer | Free | Free | Reads a transcript. Hiring managers, panels, anyone downstream. |
This is where seat pricing usually fails in hiring tools: reading an interview is the cheap, valuable thing, and charging for it teaches a company to ration logins. Then the person who should have read the transcript never gets one, and eventually nobody bothers writing them.
What Business actually adds
Two things, and they are the things that matter at size.
More than one hiring team, each with its own roles, its own panel, its own calendar and its own pipeline — under one bill and one set of permissions. Platform hiring and Sales Engineering hiring are not the same search, and making them share a board is how both of them get worse. And your ATS: roles and candidates imported from Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, SmartRecruiters or Workable, so nothing is retyped. Everything else about the product is the same on every plan.
Ten interviews a month, free, on the whole product.
Not a trial, and not a stripped version. Nobody can judge an interview tool through a keyhole.