Scorecards

Decisions you can defend.

A scorecard is the write-up each interviewer files after a round. Here the criteria live on the round, nobody reads another card before filing their own, and a filed card cannot be changed — so two people who sat the same interview rated the same things, independently, and the record of it lasts.

macOS app, Windows next · free for ten interviews a month, no card

Three rules, all enforced where they cannot be bent.

Each of them is checked by the server, not asked of the interface, so a card looks the same whether it was filed in the app or came in from your ATS.

The criteria live on the round
Not on the interviewer, not on the candidate. Two people who sat the same round rated the same things, and two candidates who sat it are comparable.
Nobody reads another card before filing their own
Anchoring on the first opinion in the room is the failure structured interviewing exists to prevent. Until you have filed, the panel’s cards are not shown to you — enforced on the server, not hidden in the interface.
A filed card cannot be changed by the person who filed it
Otherwise the first rule is decoration: file a placeholder, read everyone else, revise. A filed card is the record; the server refuses the edit and points to an admin.
A scorecard being written after a round: the round's criteria down the form, a verdict, notes, and the transcript on the same screen.
The write-up, with the round’s criteria already on it and the transcript alongside. The panel’s other cards appear only once this one is filed.

Criteria that ask the right shape of question.

Each criterion on a round has a name, guidance for the interviewer, and a kind — so a yes-or-no question is not forced into a one-to-four, and a template imported from your ATS keeps the shape it had there. Mark one required and a card cannot be filed without it.

A rating
One to four, no middle — so a verdict is a verdict.
Yes or no
Did they do the thing.
A choice
From options you wrote, or that came in with an imported template.
Free text
Where the evidence is a sentence. What they did, not how they seemed.
The criteria on a round being edited: each with a name, guidance for the interviewer, its kind — rating, yes or no, choice, text — and whether it is required.
The criteria on a round. Name, guidance, kind, required. Every change here is kept as a version.

The write-up that is missing is chased for you.

After the hours you set — eighteen by default, or two, or two days — the interviewers who have not filed get an email with the form and the transcript on the same screen, and your queue shows who still owes one. Nobody writes “gentle reminder”.

The chase, like every reminder here, goes out once however many times the clock runs, and never inside the quiet hours you set for the person receiving it.

Then the debrief: disagreement first.

One candidate’s whole loop on one page — every round, each interviewer’s verdict beside the others, the write-ups still owed counted rather than guessed at. The rounds where the panel split are shown first, because agreement needs no meeting and the only thing worth anyone’s time is the round two people saw differently. Reading it is free and needs no paid seat.

One candidate's debrief: each round of their loop with the panel's verdicts side by side, the round where the panel split shown first, and the write-ups still awaited counted.
A candidate’s debrief. The split round is at the top.

Connected to your ATS.

Scorecards already written in your ATS — Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable or SmartRecruiters — come in with the candidate, filed against the interview they were written for where the ATS names one and otherwise on the stage, and matched to the criteria on the round by the ATS’s own id or an exact name — an attribute with no match is kept, never dropped, and a “mixed” that has no place on a one-to-four scale keeps its label rather than being invented as a number. From Workable and SmartRecruiters a card is a rating and a note, with no marks per criterion, because neither vendor exposes them. Cards written here stay here until write-back exists, and that is said here rather than found out later. What comes in from each ATS is on the integrations page.

The verdict is the same five points every ATS uses under different names — strong no, no, mixed, yes, strong yes — so a verdict survives the trip in without being invented or lost.

The last thing that should ever expire.

Structured criteria, filed independently by named assessors, are the evidence that a hiring decision was made on the job. So when retention is built — it is designed, per organisation and per class of data, with a legal hold, and not yet built — scorecards are what it keeps and interview content is what it expires. Every change to a round’s criteria is already kept as a version, so “this candidate was assessed under these criteria” is answerable later.

Two candidates, one round, the same questions.

Ten interviews a month, free, on the whole product. Scorecards and the debrief are on every plan; the hiring manager reads them on a free seat.